I admire the ancient Greeks and
draw wisdom in their view of citizenship- being a member of a polis
(city-state) has the common expectation that a citizen is an informed
participate in the political life of the polis. This civic engagement was the foundation
of their democratic process. Granted those Greeks were not perfect who they
allowed to be citizens but at least they possessed the basic concept of civic participation
and willing to defend their freedom to do so in a series of land and naval
engagements against the Middle Eastern colossus of the day, the Persian Empire.
Nevertheless, I depart from the
Greek ideal of democracy for our modern times. Popular assemblies open to all
citizens were effective for them in directly electing leaders and judges, setting
tax rates, and determining policies such as war and peace. But Greek democracy was
also open to manipulation by soaring oratory feeding the people’s fears. As a result,
tyrants became powerful and those who were at time in the political minorities could
be exiled by their polis or even executed. This is pure democracy at its best
and worst.
In our contemporary United States
we have several examples of pure democracy- village and town meetings in our
New England states, juries of our peers deciding justice in civil and criminal
cases, and in a sense, the unicameral legislature of Nebraska. But a the national
level pure democracy would be a disaster. Our Founders were wise enough to realize
that the rule of the mob (their view of pure democracy) so they created a
constitutional republic rather than a democracy. There is a difference between the
two and that is why I am a constitutional republican (not the small r.).
Our Federal Constitution skewed
towards republicanism in several ways:
·
Enumerated powers for the national government.
·
Power sharing between the national government
and states.
·
Checks and balances among the three branches of
the national government.
·
Presidents elected by electors and not by popular
vote.
·
Senators elected by state legislatures (since
amended to popular vote) and one- third elected every two years for six-year
terms.
·
Representatives only to live in state they represent
and not in district from which elected.
·
Each house of Congress able to determine its own
rules (hence the Senate filibuster rule).
·
State legislatures to determine their own election
laws.
Therefore, when you hear someone mention
democratic ideals, ask him/her what exactly what do they mean by democracy. And remember the following
quote by Edmund Burke, British political theorist and Member of Parliament (mentioned
in the movie and musical 1776)- “Your representative owes
you, not his industry only, but his judgment; and he betrays instead of serving you if he
sacrifices it to your opinion."
Thank you, Edmund Burke and American Founders for insisting
upon constitutional republicanism rather by pure democracy for the order of government.
There is a difference between the two and that is why I am a constitutional republican (not the small r.).
ReplyDeleteDid you mean Note vs not?
Otherwise good posting. I agree that we are not and should not be a pure democracy, but also I think our government has allowed all legal citizens a vote. America has pretty much always had issues with who can vote. Which is basically saying who is a legal citizen.
Some cities are allowing non-citizens to vote in local elections.
ReplyDelete